@conference {1801, title = {Simulating the Energy Performance of Holographic Glazings}, booktitle = {13th SPIE International Symposium on Optical Materials Technology for Energy Efficiency and Solar Energy Conversion}, year = {1994}, month = {04/1994}, address = {Freiburg, Germany}, abstract = {

The light diffraction properties of holographic diffractive structures present an opportunity to improve the daylight performance in side-lit office spaces by redirecting and reflecting sunlight off the ceiling, providing adequate daylight illumination up to 30 ft (9.14 m) from the window wall. Prior studies of prototypical holographic glazings, installed above conventional view windows, have shown increased daylight levels over a deeper perimeter area than clear glass, for selected sun positions. In this study, we report on the simulation of the energy performance of prototypical holographic glazings assuming a commercial office building in the inland Los Angeles climate.

The simulation of the energy performance involved determination of both luminous and thermal performance. Since the optical complexity of holographic glazings prevented the use of conventional algorithms for the simulation of their luminous performance, we used a newly developed method that combines experimentally determined directional workplane illuminance coefficients with computer-based analytical routines to determine a comprehensive set of daylight factors for many sun positions. These daylight factors were then used within the DOE-2.1D energy simulation program to determine hourly daylight and energy performance over the course of an entire year for four window orientations.

Since the prototypical holographic diffractive structures considered in this study were applied on single pane clear glass, we also simulated the performance of hypothetical glazings, assuming the daylight performance of the prototype holographic glazings and the thermal performance of double-pane and low-e glazings. The results of our analyses show that these prototypical holographic glazings did not save significant electric energy or reduce peak electricity demand compared to conventional energy-efficient window systems in inland Los Angeles office buildings, mainly because of their low diffraction efficiency. Finally, we address various design and implementation issues towards potential performance improvement.

}, author = {Konstantinos M. Papamichael and Liliana O. Beltran and Reto A. Furler and Eleanor S. Lee and Stephen E. Selkowitz and Michael D. Rubin} } @techreport {1379, title = {The Energy Performance of Prototype Holographic Glazings}, year = {1993}, month = {02/1993}, abstract = {

We report on the simulation of the energy performance of prototype holographic glazings in commercial office buildings in a California climate. These prototype glazings, installed above conventional side windows, are designed to diffract the transmitted solar radiation and reflect it off the ceiling, providing adequate daylight illumination for typical office tasks up to 10m from the window. In this study, we experimentally determined a comprehensive set of solar-optical properties and characterized the contribution of the prototype holographic glazings to workplane illuminance in a scale model of a typical office space. We then used the scale model measurements to simulate the energy performance of the holographic glazings over the course of an entire year for four window orientations (North, East, South and West) for the inland Los Angeles climate, using the DOE-2.lD building energy analysis computer program. The results of our experimental analyses indicate that these prototype holographic glazings diffract only a small fraction of the incident light. The results of this study indicate that these prototype holographic glazings will not save energy in commercial office buildings. Their performance is very similar to that of clear glass, which, through side windows, cannot efficiently illuminate more than a 4m - 6m depth of a building{\textquoteleft}s perimeter, because the cooling penalties due to solar heat gain are greater than the electric lighting savings due to daylighting.

}, author = {Konstantinos M. Papamichael and Liliana O. Beltran and Reto A. Furler and Eleanor S. Lee and Stephen E. Selkowitz and Michael D. Rubin} }